33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of the police will be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and higher than all, make sure legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair for the offender as well as Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair towards the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that the moment the act of misconduct is proven along with the employee is found guilty after thanks process of law, it's the prerogative from the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, out of the varied penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed isn't proportionate with the seriousness from the act of misconduct isn't satisfactory nevertheless the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion within a structured and lawful manner. Read more
A lot of the volumes (including more recent volumes than the library's holdings) can also be offered online through the Caselaw Access Project.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were explained to from the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were safe with him in their home. The therapist assured them that they'd almost nothing to fret about.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there may perhaps exist conflicts between the different lower appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it might be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common regulation, is a law that is based on precedents, that is the judicial decisions from previous cases, somewhat than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
five hundred,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) Every single as well as same shall be retained while in the police station into the effect that no harm shall be caused on the petitioners. five. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to the offender and also the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information being gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is usually important to note that neither seniority nor promotion is definitely the vested right of the civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion may very well be claimed or granted without the actual length of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular length of service for becoming entitled being deemed for promotion into a higher grade, of course, is not really without logic because the officer who is initially inducted to a particular post needs to provide to the mentioned post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to provide the public in a very befitting way.
States also generally have courts that take care of only a specific subset of legal matters, which include family law and probate. Case law, also known as precedent or common legislation, could be the more info body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending on the relationship between the deciding court and also the precedent, case law could be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision through the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) will not be strictly bound to Adhere to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a person district court in New York is not really binding on another district court, but the first court’s reasoning might help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions via the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more